Feminism wrong way to achieve the goal

Feminism and extremism in achieving the goal

Introduction

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Often on our way to achieving lofty goals we err in a way to
achieve this goal. Because of our misunderstanding of the basic purpose of the
goal we need to be achieving. For example feminism and how it lofty goal switch
to conflict with mans although the feminism its way to equal society and to
preserving of the society and stability society Which has not been achieved
because of the wrong way to achieve the goal and also extremism in achieving
the goal .that what I will argue in my essay

Essay

At first, I try to define the feminist movements and
feminism goal, Feminism is a range of political movements, ideologies, and
social movements that share a common goal: to define, establish and achieve
political, economic, personal, and social equality of sexes. This includes
seeking to establish educational and professional opportunities for women that
are equal to those for men. Feminist movements have campaigned and continue to
campaign for women’s rights, including the right to vote, to hold public
office, to work, to earn fair wages or equal pay, to own property, to receive
education, to enter contracts, to have equal rights within marriage, and to
have maternity leave. Feminists have also worked to promote bodily autonomy and
integrity, and to protect women and girls from rape, sexual harassment, and
domestic violence. Changes in dress and acceptable physical activity have often
been part of feminist movements. Feminist campaigns are generally considered to
be a main force behind major historical societal changes for women’s rights,
particularly in the West, where they are near-universally credited with
achieving women’s suffrage, gender neutrality in English, reproductive rights
for women (including access to contraceptives and abortion), and the right to
enter into contracts and own property. Although feminist advocacy is, and has
been, mainly focused on women’s rights, some feminists, including bell hooks,
argue for the inclusion of men’s liberation within its aims because men are
also harmed by traditional gender roles. Feminist theory, which emerged from
feminist movements, aims to understand the nature of gender inequality by
examining women’s social roles and lived experience; it has developed theories
in a variety of disciplines in order to respond to issues concerning gender.
Numerous feminist movements and ideologies have developed over the years and
represent different viewpoints and aims. Some forms of feminism have been
criticized for taking into account only white, middle class, and
college-educated perspectives. This criticism led to the creation of ethnically
specific or multicultural forms of feminism, including black feminism and
intersectional feminism.

-How has this noble goal turned into a conflict, which has
harmed society?

Today’s feminism teaches women to see themselves as victims
and men as perverts, bullies, and misogynists, says Natasha Devon ,At the end
of the session, one of the Society’s senior members said: “It’s great that
you don’t think there’s any misogyny in your world, but I think if you  to these men for long enough you’d find there
were some pretty sinister ideas about women buried somewhere beneath the
surface.”

In that moment, I suddenly realized why so many aspects of
the modern feminist movement in Britain irritate me so much. Don’t
misunderstand, I’d consider myself a feminist and I’m all for structural
changes which ensure equal treatment of the sexes – the types that are working
to ensure we have an equal number of female MPs and laws to prevent female
genital mutilation, for example. But cultural “feminist” changes, the
types that insist lads mags, Page 3 and wolf-whistling are automatically
offensive and should, therefore, be scrapped from the public consciousness, I
have always struggled to comprehend. For, at their crux is the notion that men
are either genetically or socially conditioned to be evil. This explains why
relatively harmless acts – an admiring glance, a whistle, a propensity for lad’s
mags – are imbued with such weighty significance, often lazily labeled as
“rapey”.

Today’s feminism teaches British women to see themselves as
victims and victims cannot exist without a villain, in this instance – men. In
order for this thesis to have any kind of logic, feminists have made sweeping,
inaccurate judgments about an entire demographic, based on nothing more than
their gender. Ironically, the exact practice they claim to be fighting. Gender
equality requires co-operation on all sides. As a humanist, I’d like to see
today’s feminists give men a bit more credit – they might just be surprised.
But there is one term that describes this state of hostility: Misandry, a term
that is quite different from the feminist movement concerned with equality in
society, regardless of sex. There may be male homosexuals, but men’s hatred is
not a condition to belong to the feminist movement. Although it is undeniable
that such a menopause is not to be denied, it is also impossible to ignore the
fact that the enemies of the feminist movement have been caught up in these
individual cases at the expense of the vast majority of moderate feminists,
writers, and institutions.Feminism movement is hateful for
man a men? And it is Restricted to women gender equality It is nice to say that
feminism includes male elements as well. There are many women men who, in turn,
are marginalized and ridiculed if they stand up to the rights of women, which
are labeled as non-men and the like. Women’s men are also part of the community
system And repression, so it is also a witness to what the female suffers. But
yes, most women are women, of course, because the female is first and finally
the biggest loser. As for feminism, it is completely contrary to the truth.
Feminists hate racists and masculine’s of both sexes, hate the enemies of
equality and women’s rights of any sex, and stand against them all.

In 1997,
sociologist Alan Johnson, in his book The Sex Syndrome, revealed our
patriarchal heritage that male-hatred charges were used to silence demands for
gender equality and to shift attention to men in a way that promoted male
culture. Johnson noted that the term Misandry: (hatred of men) did not appear
in dictionaries until recently, and comparisons between him and the term
Misogyny: (hatred of women) and found it shaded movement because the prevailing
culture does not show any comparison against male ideology. “People are
often confused between men as independent individuals and men as a dominant and
privileged group.” He wrote that given the “reality of women’s
oppression, male privilege, and the influence of men, both men and women, It is
not surprising that every woman should have moments in which men despise or
even hate them. ”

The
feminist model of conflict resolution serves as a lens for assessing and
responding to sources of conflict. This model addresses conflict through the
dismantling of unequal power relations in community structures. The feminist
discourse aims to resolve inequality at multiple levels of existence: within
personality, personality, society, international, environmental, and religious.
The feminist model of conflict resolution identifies sources of conflict as
derivatives of repression by dominant culture and supported by hegemonic
structures, such as racism, gender discrimination, heterogeneity, class,
capable body and aging.

 

For
example, a white woman, healthy, upper class, educated, heterosexual and
wearing a business suit and black, overweight, without education, Q / gay man
wearing sweat pants both go to the staff meeting. Let’s say that the two of
them are engaged in a struggle for parking space in their office building.
During the negotiation process, a panel of professionals may not evaluate each
particular man, and these arguments for women are equal. Because of the social
structures present in our culture, we appreciate the authority of the upper
class white women on the needs or concerns of a person of color who did not
conform to the standards established by the dominant culture. As a culture, we
have learned to put greater value on whiteness, wealth, beauty, gender
equality, and so on. A feminist model of conflict resolution will examine the
specific problem of parking space, as well as the disparities in power that
exacerbate conflict, affect the way in which the two parties continue to shape
the dynamics of power in American society. Repression is our life, And feminist
criticism of dominant culture through a feminist model that maintains a larger
community structure. We are not all equal members in the field of play, and as
the black feminist writer Bill Hooks reminds us, we live in “White
capitalist capitalism patriarchies”, and our life forms these structures
and ideologies every day (Hawkes, 1997).

 

This
model views conflict not only as a “common phenomenon in our lives”
but also as conflict resolution as a means of addressing the type of conflict
that results from inequality and oppression. Thus, the feminist model uses
conflict resolution as a tool for changing a society that is already witnessing
conflict. Moreover, “the negative consequences of the conflict get as much
of the press as they do, but more than the positive outcomes – which are linked
to the unrest … On the other hand, conflict also offers opportunities such as
personal growth, relational development, and the identification and treatment
of problems” Otsel & Ting-Tommy, 2006). Conclusion

this conflict resulted in the emergence of other side means(
Men’s rights movement )facing and defending men’s it push to increase community
conflict, The situation became like a cold war And it appeared clearly in the
social media and movies and songs that call against men Ex, Dua Lipa( new rules
),  Dolls (i don’t need a man) ….Etc.

The basic purpose of feminism is community stability This is
achieved by not being biased towards sex on another It could be a man who is
hugely caller for Women’s rights .A woman could be the biggest violator of
women’s rights The man for the woman is husband, son, and father, not enemy,
the woman is wife, mother, and daughter, and not the enemy, But the real enemy
is who makes and push the hatred between Pillars society

Sources

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10831043/Modern-feminism-has-got-it-wrong-about-men.html

https://sites.google.com/a/pdx.edu/models-of-conflict-resolution/home/feminist-model

Go Top
x

Hi!
I'm Eleanor!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out